project‑KANO (EN)
project‑KANO is an institutional and technical design framework that enables Taiwan to choose its future freely, while allowing Japan to align with that choice without altering sovereignty or political structure.
No. It is not a political party, campaign, or ideology.
It is a design blueprint created by an NPO.
project‑KANO does not advocate for any specific political outcome.
It only ensures that Taiwanese people can choose freely, without coercion.
No.
Japan’s sovereignty, constitution, and political structure remain unchanged.
No.
Taiwan’s democratic system and sovereignty remain fully intact.
No.
project‑KANO is not a unification plan, alliance plan, or military framework.
Because the risk of forced status‑quo change in the region is rising,
while institutional cooperation between Japan and Taiwan remains insufficient.
It was created by an IT architect with 25 years of experience in
institutional design, system architecture, and cross‑sector coordination.
Because it represents a designable, selectable future
based on four axes: Life, Name, Form, and Trajectory.
To create minimal and maximal common rules
that allow peaceful cooperation without political integration.
No.
It deals only with institutional, technical, and civil frameworks.
No.
The design is Taiwan‑first, and Japan aligns with Taiwan’s standards.
Not at the initial stage.
It begins with NPO‑level design, research, and pilot programs.
Yes.
The design is intentionally made to be adoptable by public institutions.
No.
It is a voluntary, cooperative framework.
No.
It does not intervene in PRC–Taiwan relations.
No.
project‑KANO is pro‑peace, not anti‑any country.
No.
Neither Japan nor Taiwan needs constitutional amendments.
The minimum shared standards for transparency, records, signatures,
and institutional safety.
A framework for interoperable identity and authentication
without unifying identity systems.
A method for aligning institutional structures
so they do not contradict each other.
A shared framework for continuity, records, accountability, and openness.
No.
It creates no new political entity.
No.
No.
It aligns existing systems without replacing them.
Citizens, engineers, public institutions, and anyone who values
peace, transparency, and democratic continuity.
No.
It is designed to be understandable and accessible to the public.
Yes.
Volunteers, researchers, engineers, and civil society members are welcome.
Yes.
Private‑sector collaboration is essential for implementation.
No.
It is independent.
No.
Only within strict, transparent, and minimal frameworks.
No.
It explicitly rejects any form of surveillance architecture.
No.
It is grounded in democracy, transparency, and accountability.
The framework is designed to function even with partial adoption.
To eliminate the possibility of forced status‑quo change
and preserve democratic continuity in the region.
By reading the documents, joining discussions,
and contributing your expertise at your own pace.